Lumière brothers: Train arriving at the Station of Ciotat (1895)Language and Film / Language in film : Overview of course

John Bateman, SS2007

In this course we explore the rich history of interaction between language, linguistics and film. Participants in the course will be introduced to a variety of approaches to film theory and to the kinds and functions of language used in film. Readings are in the copyshop.

NOTE THAT THE SLOTS HAVE NOW BEEN RESCHEDULED TO MAKE UP FOR THE DELAY AT THE BEGINNING... IF THIS CAUSES PROBLEMS FOR YOUR PRESENTATION: GET IN TOUCH!

Requirements:
For a Leistungsschein, participants should take on one of the Referat topics distributed at the beginning of the course, present a discussion of an analysis of some selected portion of film using a combination of the techniques described in the course, and to write this up as a written analysis. For a Teilnahmeschein, participants need only to take on a Referat. Regular participation and keeping up with the readings as these are discussed in class is necessary to follow the discussion.

Recommended background reading books for the course:

Click here for extra materials, copies of overheads, etc.

 

Schedule

16.4.2007

Introduction: Language in Film, Film as text?

Connections and differences: the aims of the course, requirements, etc..

Language in particular and language as such

  • Cohesion and grammar: is an image a word? a clause? A text?
  • Causal and textual connections : visual cuts and mental joins
  • Generic structures and narrative : Propp and Hollywood

23.4.2007

The basic vocabulary for film descriptions

Reading

James Monaco (2000, 3rd. edition) How to read a film. Oxford University Press.

  • Mise-en-scène, pp179-195
  • Shots, pp195-212
  • Montage, pp216-225

30.4.2007

Classical film theory; contrasting views: Eisenstein and Bazin

Reading:

Tudor, Andrew (1974) “Eisenstein: great beginnings”. In: Theories of film. Secker & Warburg. Chap.2, pp25-58

Eisenstein, Sergei E. (1949) Film form: essays in film theory. Translated by Jay Leyda. Harcourt Brace & Co. publishers.

·        “The cinematographic principle and the ideogram” (1929), pp38-41.

·        “A dialectic approach to film form” (1929),  pp48-63.

·        “Methods of montage” (1929), pp72-83.

·        “Film language” (1934),  pp115-121.

 

7.5.2007

Classical film theory; contrasting views: Eisenstein and Bazin

Reading:

Andrew, J. Dudley (1976) “André Bazin”. In: The Major Film Theories: an introduction. Oxford University Press. Chap.6, pp134—178.

Bazin, André (1950-1955) “The evolution of the language of the cinema” In: What is cinema? Translated and reprinted in: Bazin (1967, trans. Hugh Gray) University of California Press, pp23-40.

 

 

14.5.2007

Classical film theory; film and semiotics

 Reading:

Chandler, Daniel (2002) Semiotics: the basics. Routledge. Chapter 1: Models of the sign. pp 17-54.

Buckland, Warren (1999) Film Semiotics.

 

21.5.2007

Classical film theory; film and semiotics

Andrew, J. Dudley (1976) “Christian Metz and the Semiology of the Cinema”. In: The Major Film Theories: an introduction. Oxford University Press. Chap.8, pp212—241.

Christian Metz (1974) Film language: a semiotics of the cinema Chap5. “Problems of the denotation of the fiction film”, pp108-146.

Analyses

Applications of the accounts discussed so far to particular film extracts made available beforehand. Analyses will be done in groups, prepared and discussed in this session. Problems with the methods for analysis should be brought and possible ways of fixing them considered.

 

28.5.2007

Pfingstmontag

 

4.6.2007

Non-classical film theory: Visual language and visual semiotics

Reading:

Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen, Theo (1996) Narrative representation: designing social action. In: Reading Images: the grammar of visual design. Chap 2,  pp43-75

van Leeuwen, Theo (1996) Moving English: the visual language of film. In: Goodman/Graddol. Redesigning English: new texts, new identities. Routledge. Chap 2, Reading B. pp81-105.

 

11.6.2007

The logic of connection …

Reading:

van Leeuwen, Theo (2005) Introducing social semiotics, Routledge. Chapter 11. “Information Linking”. pp219-247

van Leeuwen, T. (1991), 'Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television', Continuum: journal of media and cultural studies 5(1), 76--114.

 

18.6.2007

…  and the structure of film

Reading:

Schmidt, K. & Strauch, T. (2002), 'Zur chronologischen Syntagmatik von Bewegtbilddaten', Kodikas/Code: Ars Semeiotica 25(1-2), 65--96.

van Leeuwen (1985) Rhythmic structure of the film text. In van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and Communication: new approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication, pp216-232.

 

25.6.2007

Re-Analyses and Adaptation: film as discourse

To what extent to the newer developments discussed overcome or add to the problems that we ran up against in the last analysis session?

And can we now say something about what happens when material that was first expressed in a different mode, such as a novel or a play, is ‘adapted’ for film? How are the techniques that we have seen so far deployed for the purposes of filmic narrative?

Reading:

Bordwell, D. (1985) ‘Mimetic theories of narration’ (extract)

Bordwell, D. (2002) ‘Intensified Continuity: visual style in contemporary American Film’. Film Quarterly 55(3):16—28.

 

2.7.2007

Discussions of working groups and presentations of analyses: I

9.7.2007

Discussions of working groups and presentations of analyses: II

16.7.2007

Conclusions, Summary, What next? Is film a language?